Traffic Impact Analysis
Understanding the demands placed on the community’s transportation network by
development is an important dimension of assessing the overall impacts of
development.
All development generates traffic, and it may generate enough traffic to create
congestion and to compel the community to invest more capital into
the transportation network, whether it is in the form of new roads or
traffic signals or turn lanes. Traffic congestion results in a number of
problems, including economic costs due to delayed travel times, air pollution
and accidents. As one roadway becomes congested, drivers may use
others not necessarily intended for through traffic. As a result, traffic
impact analyses are becoming more common as a planning tool to fore-see
demands on the transportation network and to mitigate any negative
impacts. Understanding traffic impacts becomes even more important as
budgets for public facility and infrastructure improvements become
increasingly strained.
WHAT IS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)?
A traffic impact analysis is a study which assesses the effects that a
particular
development’s traffic will have on the transportation network in the
community. These studies vary in their range of detail and complexity
depending on the type, size and location of the development. Traffic
impact studies should accompany developments which have the potential
to impact the transportation network. They are important in assisting
public agencies in making land use decisions. These studies can be used
to help evaluate whether the development is appropriate for a site and
what type of transportation improvements may be necessary.
Traffic impact studies help communities to:
-
Forecast additional traffic associated with new development, based on
accepted practices.
-
Determine the improvements that are necessary to accommodate the new
development.
-
Assist communities in land use decision making.
-
Assist in allocating scarce resources to areas which need improvements
-
Identify potential problems with the proposed development which may influence
the developer’s decision to pursue it.
-
Allow the community to assess the impacts that a proposed development may
have.
-
Help to ensure safe and reasonable traffic conditions on streets after the
development
is complete.
-
Reduce the negative impacts created by developments by helping to ensure that
the transportation network can accommodate the development.
-
Provide direction to community decision makers and developers of expected
impacts.
-
Protect the substantial community investment in the street system.
Traffic impact analysis is only one component of the larger transportation puzzle.
In addition, large communities in particular will need to determine appropriate mixes
of transportation modes, including public transit options. Community growth pat-terns
and characteristics can be substantially affected by highway expansion or re-alignment
decisions made at state or federal levels. Traffic impact analysis is focused
on the effects of a particular set of developments, but may provide information
relevant
to these broader plans and decisions. Traffic impact studies should be used as
one piece of several kinds of information to judge the suitability of development
from a transportation standpoint.
Traffic impact
studies do not:
-
Provide an indication
of development’s
impact on
other modes of
transportation, such
as bus service.
-
Characterize the
suitability of a
development for
other modes, particularly
pedestrian
and bicycle movement.
-
Characterize the
spatial patterns of
demand, particularly
where alternate
route-seekers will
travel.
|
WHEN IS A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NECESSARY?
A traffic impact study is not necessary for every development. Those developments that
are unlikely to generate significant traffic generally do not need a traffic impact
assessment.
When does a development warrant a traffic impact assessment? One of the
approaches for determining whether a traffic impact analysis should be required for a
proposed development is the use of trip generation data. The trip generation of a pro-posed
development is essentially the number of inbound and outbound vehicle trips
that are expected to be generated by the development during an average day or during
peak hour traffic. The process outlined in this chapter entails calculating the expected
trip generation of the proposed development and comparing it to accepted thresholds
to determine whether the comprehensive traffic analysis is needed. A comprehensive
traffic impact analysis procedure is beyond the scope of this workbook; however the
workbook does describe the impacts that should be included in a full study.
Generally, a comprehensive traffic analysis should be completed whenever a
development is expected to generate 100 or more new inbound or outbound trips
during the peak hours (ITE recommended practice). Developments containing about
150 single-family homes, 220 multi-family units, 55,000 square feet of general office
space or a 15,500 square foot shopping center would be expected to generate this
level of traffic and hence, require a complete traffic analysis.
The trip generation process provides an estimate of the number of trips that will
be generated due to the new development. Trip generation rates are then applied to
the various land uses within the development.
The ITE trip generation manual is based on hundreds of trip generation surveys
nationwide for a range of land use types. It is the most commonly accepted data
source for trip generation rates. Generally, examining those numbers based on the
peak-hour conditions are used in traffic assessments. An analysis of peak-hour
conditions
results in a more accurate identification of site traffic
impacts.
Table 3.1 provides some examples of developments
which would require a traffic impact analysis according to
the thresholds recommended by ITE.
|
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER’S (ITE) GENERAL THRESHOLD RECOMMENDATION
Any proposed site plan or subdivision plan
which would be expected to generate over
one hundred (100) directional trips during the
peak hour of the traffic generator or the peak
hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven
hundred fifty (750) trips in an average day. |
Communities may wish to use their own thresholds. A
larger community with many high volume streets, for example,
may need to consider a higher threshold. Thresholds may need to be lower for corridors which are already experiencing congestion. Table
3.2 provides some examples of thresholds used in other areas. They are generally
based on either the size of the development, trip generation or level of service.
Table 3.1 Threshold Levels
|
|
Land Use |
100 Peak Hour Trips |
750 Daily Trips |
|
Residential: Single Family |
150 units |
70 units |
|
Apartments |
245 units |
120 units |
|
Condos/Townhouses |
295 units |
120 units |
|
Mobile Home Park |
305 units |
150 units |
|
Shopping Center |
15,500 sq. ft. |
2,700 sq. ft. |
|
Fast Food Restaurant (GFA) |
5,200 sq. ft. |
1,200 sq. ft. |
|
Convenience Store w/ gas (GFA) |
1,300 sq. ft. or 5 pumps |
|
|
Bank w/ Drive-In |
4,400 sq. ft. |
2,800 sq. ft. |
|
Hotel/Motel |
250 rooms |
90 rooms |
|
General Office |
55,000 sq. ft. |
45,000 sq. ft. |
|
Medical/Dental Office |
37,000 sq. ft. |
26,000 sq. ft. |
|
Research & Development |
85,000 sq. ft or 4.5 acres |
70,000 sq. ft or 4 acres |
|
Light Industrial |
115,000 sq. ft. or 8 acres |
115,000 sq ft. or 11.5 acres |
|
Manufacturing |
250,000 sq. ft. |
195,000 sq. ft. |
|
IS A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS NECESSARY FOR DEVELOPMENT THAT
DO NOT MEET THE THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS?
Even if the development does not generate the threshold level of trips, a traffic
analysis may still be necessary under the following conditions:
-
High traffic volumes on surrounding roads that my affect movement to and from
the proposed development.
-
Lack of existing left turn lands on the adjacent roadway at the proposed access
drive.
-
Inadequate sight distance at access points.
- The proximity of the proposed access points to other existing drives or
intersections.
-
A development that includes a drive-through operation.
METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRIPS GENERATED BY A DEVELOPMENT
-
The use of standard rates used by local and regional planning agencies, which are most often
based on previous projects.
-
Standards from similar locations, built by the same developer or company.
-
Surveys of sites in comparable areas.
-
Literature on rates in journals, such as the ITE Journal.
-
Trip Generation Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ publication, Trip Generation.
|
Table 3.2 Community Threshold Levels
|
|
Community/State |
Traffic Impact Study Threshold |
|
|
ITE Recommended Practice |
- 100 additional peak hour trips |
City of Farmington Hills,
Oakland County |
- sites with 10 or more acres
and Oakland County Traffic
- building with 100,000 or more sq. ft. GFA
Improvement Association
- 200 or more dwelling units
- 300 or more peak hour trips
- substantial departure from Master Plan
- discretionary standards based on impact |
|
City of Grand Blanc, Gennessee County, MI |
- rezonings inconsistent with
Master Plan
- certain special land uses
- sites with 20 or more acres
- 200 or more dwelling units
- 150,000 or more sq. ft. |
| GFA
Northville Township, Wayne County, MI |
- certain rezonings
- 50 peak hour directional trips along
selected roads
- 100 peak hour trips or 750 daily trips
elsewhere |
|
City of Rochester Hills, Oakland County, MI |
- 150 peak hour trips or 750 trips daily
- 75 or more single family dwelling units
- 100 or more multiple family dwelling units
- 50,000 sq. ft. or more commercial units
- 20 acres light industrial |
|
New Jersey Department of Transportation |
- 200 peak hour trips |
| Arizona Department of Transportation |
- 100 peak hour directional trips |
|
Maryland |
- 50 peak hour directional trips |
|
Indiana Department of Transportation (proposed) |
- 100 peak hour directional trips
- if LOS drops by a letter grade
- modifications to roadway are required |
|
California Department of Transportation |
- 2,400 daily trips/1,600 along a congested
corridor |
|
Oregon Department of Transportation |
- 500 vehicles per day |
|
New York Department of Transportation |
- 100 peak hour trips |
|
Arapahoe County, Colorado |
- 500 daily trips
- certain smaller projects |
|
DuPage County, Illinois |
- whenever a development deteriorates
LOS beyond
community LOS Standard (C or D) |
|
New Mexico |
- all new commercial/industrial
developments |
|
Mississippi |
- when a traffic signal is warranted |
|
|
Source: Dey Soumya, S. and Jon D. Fricker, Traffic Impact Analysis and Impact Fees in State Departments of
Transportation,
ITE Journal, May 1994. |
|
HOW ARE TRIPS GENERATED CALCULATED?
To calculate the number of trips expected to be generated by the proposed development
in your community, apply the appropriate rate below to the proposed land use.
|
Table 3.3 Trip Generation Rates |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
|
|
Land Use |
Base Unit |
AM Peak |
ADT |
ADT Range |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
Single Family Home |
per dwelling unit |
.75 |
9.55 |
4.31-21.85 |
|
Apartment Building |
per dwelling unit |
.41 |
6.63 |
2.00-11.81 |
|
Condo/TownHome |
per dwelling unit |
.44 |
10.71 |
1.83-11.79 |
|
Retirement Community |
per dwelling unit |
.29 |
5.86 |
|
|
Mobile Home Park |
per dwelling unit |
.43 |
4.81 |
2.29-10.42 |
|
Recreational Home |
per dwelling unit |
.30 |
3.16 |
3.00-3.24 |
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
Shopping Center |
per 1,000 GLA |
1.03 |
42.92 |
12.5-270.8 |
|
Discount Club |
per 1,000 GFA |
65 |
41.8 |
25.4-78.02 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
(High-turnover) |
per 1,000 GFA |
9.27 |
130.34 |
73.5-246.0 |
|
Convenience Mart w/
Gas Pumps |
per 1,000 GFA |
|
845.60 |
578.52-1084.72 |
|
Convenience Market
(24-hour) |
per 1,000 GFA |
65.3 |
737.99 |
330.0-1438.0 |
|
Specialty Retail |
per 1,000 GFA |
6.41 |
40.67 |
21.3-50.9 |
|
Office |
|
|
|
|
|
Business Park |
per employee |
.45 |
4.04 |
3.25-8.19 |
|
General Office Bldg |
per employee |
.48 |
3.32 |
1.59-7.28 |
|
R & D Center |
per employee |
.43 |
2.77 |
.96-10.63 |
|
Medical-Dental |
per 1,000 GFA |
3.6 |
36.13 |
23.16-50.51 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Park |
per employee |
.43 |
3.34 |
1.24-8.8 |
|
Manufacturing |
per employee |
.39 |
2.10 |
.60-6.66 |
|
Warehousing |
1,000 GFA |
.55 |
3.89 |
1.47-15.71 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Service Station |
per pump |
12.8 |
168.56 |
73.0-306.0 |
|
City Park |
per acre |
1.59 |
NA |
NA |
|
County Park |
per acre |
.52 |
2.28 |
17-53.4 |
|
State Park |
per acre |
.02 |
.61 |
.10-2.94 |
Movie Theatre
w/Matinee |
per movie screen |
89.48 |
529.47 |
143.5-171.5 |
| Saturday |
(PM Peak) |
|
|
|
Day Care Center |
per 1,000 GFA |
13.5 |
79.26 |
57.17-126.07 |
|
|
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip Generation. |
|
How do we account for “pass-by” trips?
Typical trip generation rates are derived from counts taken at the driveways of the
various land uses. For many land uses, not all of the trips generated at the driveway
represent new trips added to the roadways. This is due to “pass-by” trips. Pass-by
trips are made by traffic already using the adjacent roadway and enter the site as an
intermediate stop on the way from another destination. The trip may not necessarily
be “generated” by the land use under study, and thus, not a new trip added to the
transportation system. This pass-by factor should be taken into account in devising a
trip generation estimate.
The percentage of pass-by trips varies by land use. The
Institute of Transportation Engineers recommends the
adjustments for pass-by trips included in Table 3.4. For
example, “standard trip generation rates indicate that a
300,000 square foot shopping center would generate
approximately 1,320 PM peak hour trips at its driveways.
Given the above pass-by percentage of 25 percent, the
amount of additional traffic on the adjacent roadway sys-tem
would be approximately 990 trips ((1,320 X (1 - .25)).
Note that the full 1,320 trips should be shown (and analyzed)
at the site driveways—the pass-by reduction will only
affect the amount of traffic at to non-driveway intersections
within the study area.
Table 3.4 Pass-by Percentages
|
|
Land Use |
Pass-by Percentages |
|
|
Shopping Center |
|
|
Larger than 400,000 GLA |
20 |
|
100,000 to 400,000 GLA |
25 |
|
Smaller than 100,000 GLA |
35 |
|
Convenience Market |
40 |
|
Discount Club/Warehouse Store |
20 |
|
Fast Food Restaurant |
40 |
|
Sit Down Restaurant |
15 |
|
Service Station |
45 |
|
Supermarket |
20 |
|
Worksheet 3.1 is provided in the Appendix to allow you to calculate the number
of trips generated by your proposed development.
How do we account for internal trips in a multi-use development?
The method of developing a trip generation estimate must also take into
consideration
the fact that some of the trips counted at stand-alone sites are actually made
within a multi-use development, by vehicle or by an alternate mode such as walking.
The most common example of this trip-making occurs at multi-use developments
that include both residential and shopping areas. Some of the residents’ work trips
and shopping trips are made to the on-site shopping area. These trips are internal to
the multi-use site. Because they are captured on-site, a capture rate is used. A
capture
rate is a percentage reduction in traditionally developed trip forecasts to
account for internal trips. The reduction may be applied to the total trips estimated,
just as is the pass-by percentage reduction.
The ITE has found that multi-use developments could reduce trip generation esti-mates
by 24%. Note that this trip reduction for captured trips is separate from the
reduction for pass-by trips. They are distinct phenomena and both may be applicable
to a development.
What should be included in a traffic impact analysis?
Once you have determined that a traffic impact study is necessary, the scope of the
study should be specified. The following provides an outline of the recommended
content of an impact study and a series of questions for evaluating a study con-ducted
for your community:
I. BACKGROUND:
- Description of proposed development
- Identification of peak hours and whether weekends will be used in the
impact analysis
- Description of study area
- Location of proposed Access points
II. BASE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS:
- Description of road network and intersections adjacent to site and at access
points
- Counts during peak-impact hours
III. SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION:
- Trip generation rates used and the source of these rates
- Traffic generated during peak impact hours
IV. SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION:
- Method used to distribute traffic
- Table showing estimated traffic movements by direction
- Discussion of method used for traffic assignment and assumptions for
assignment
of traffic to network
V. NON-SITE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS:
- Definition of design year—opening of proposed development
- Identification of development in study area whose traffic is to be included in
calculations
- Adjustments of off-site through traffic volumes
- Assembling of off-site traffic forecast for design year
VI. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS:
- Assignment of peak-period traffic to intersections and access points
- Figures for existing peak impact traffic hours, site traffic and total traffic
- Recommended access design improvements
VII. REVIEW OF SITE PLAN:
- Internal Reservoir at access points
- Parking layout
- Loading dock locations and access, including design truck used
- Recommended changes
VIII. DISCUSSION OF FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS:
- Other developments in area
|
What are some guidelines to mitigate traffic congestion in your
community?
-
Encourage consolidation of trips by providing mixed use development.
-
Encourage alternative modes of transportation.
-
Design development to be pedestrian friendly by including smaller set-backs,
requirements for parking behind buildings, and building sidewalks—including
sidewalks that provide connections from the development to residential areas.
Endnotes
- Definitions of each land use class here.
- The AM Peak rate represents the average vehicle trip generation rate during the hour of highest volume of traffic
entering and exiting the sit in the morning. ADT is the Average Daily Trip rate or the vehicle trip generation rate
during
a 24-hour period for a weekday (unless otherwise noted).
QUESTIONS ADDRESSED BY TIA
-
Is the study area large enough to include all significant impacts from the development?
-
Does it include all critical intersections?
-
Were traffic counts taken during the critical time periods?
-
Are traffic counts recent?
-
Have all the assumptions used in the technical analysis been clearly identified?
-
Do calculated levels of service seem reasonable?
-
Does the community have acceptable standards for level of service?
-
Does the description of the proposed site agree with the site plan submitted?
-
Have trip rates been adjusted to account for public transportation, pedestrians or pass-by-trips?
-
Does the directional distribution of the site traffic seem reasonable?
-
Has pedestrian circulation been accommodated?
-
Has adequate parking been provided to meet demand?
|